Respond to my Classmate’s Post. Your responses should be substantive in nature, meaning you should present discourse by asking questions of your peers (how did they arrive at their conclusion or what was the premise of their argument). You can challenge one another and present an alternative analysis. All of this should be supported by the research of scholarly, peer-reviewed articles, and authoritative reporting (government).
                                               CLASSMATE’S POST
In an attempt to answer the question about 9/11, it’s difficult to reflect on a day when so many people lost their lives in the worst terrorist attack on American soil in history.  It’s difficult to opine whether it could have been prevented or not.  One issue I do believe is that, if President Bush had not made the decision to ground all the planes, there is the distinct possibility that more lives could have been lost.  I think it’s easy to look at these types of situations in hindsight.  As Fred Borch (2003) notes in his article in the Journal of Military History, “There can be no discussion of whether that attacks…resulted from an ‘intelligence failure’ without defining the phrase.  Does it mean these events were intelligence failures because information had been collected (or was available) that, if properly analyzed and disseminated to those in authority, would have provided tactical warning of the attack?”  Yes, there were previous attacks on American warships and the World Trade Center, but intelligence officials have concluded that, although there was always a persistent threat of an attack, there was no credible or “imminent” threat that an attack would occur on September 11, 2001.  
There are multiple instances of a failure to communicate.  Certain leads that possibly weren’t investigated thoroughly and there was a two-year long investigation into the attacks by the “9/11 commission.”  Errors in human judgment in determination of whether every lead is credible or not can play a factor but those judgment errors alone could not prevented the overall coordinated attack that occurred on 9/11.  “The investigation turned up no single damning piece of evidence that would have led agents directly to the impending attacks” (Isikoff, Klaidman, & Reno, 2003).  There is simply not enough time or manpower to investigate every threat made against the U.S. Government or America itself.  Federal agents, in their knowledge and expertise, must use their own judgment to determine whether to follow up on credible leads whether it be an attack on private citizens or property, a plot to kill the President, bombing of a federal building, or other such terroristic events.  Again, while it is easy to examine an issue in hindsight, it is the opinion of this writer that this coordinated terrorist attack took too long to plan and was so precise and detailed that there was no way to prevent it.
Borch, F. L. (2003). Comparing Pearl Harbor and ‘9/11″: Intelligence Failure? American Unpreparedness? Military responsibility? Journal of Military History, 67(3), 845–860.
Isikoff, M., Klaidman, D., & Reno, J. (2003). Failure to Communicate. Newsweek, 142(5), 34–36.

Calculate the price of your order

550 words
We'll send you the first draft for approval by September 11, 2018 at 10:52 AM
Total price:
The price is based on these factors:
Academic level
Number of pages
Basic features
  • Free title page and bibliography
  • Unlimited revisions
  • Plagiarism-free guarantee
  • Money-back guarantee
  • 24/7 support
On-demand options
  • Writer’s samples
  • Part-by-part delivery
  • Overnight delivery
  • Copies of used sources
  • Expert Proofreading
Paper format
  • 275 words per page
  • 12 pt Arial/Times New Roman
  • Double line spacing
  • Any citation style (APA, MLA, Chicago/Turabian, Harvard)

Our guarantees

Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.

Money-back guarantee

You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.

Read more

Zero-plagiarism guarantee

Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.

Read more

Free-revision policy

Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.

Read more

Privacy policy

Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.

Read more

Fair-cooperation guarantee

By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.

Read more