Gun control is all legal measures meant for restricting or preventing the use or possession of firearms. Gun control is most controversial in the United States as the possession of weapons is most protected, but unfortunately, where mass murders are most common.
The debate on gun control has seen politicians, as well as civilians, speak honestly and passionately about how the gun violence epidemic needs to be controlled. Mass murders have been rampant in areas such as Texas, Charleston, South California, and so forth. 2018 alone experienced an average of at least one shooting every month. On August 31, 2019, A man opened fire during a traffic stop in a state trooper and drove away, killing seven and injuring thirteen people.
On August 4, 2019, a gunman, using a .223-caliber rifle, shot and killed nine people while injuring about 27 people in Dayton Ohio. The shooter was wearing body armor with high capacity magazines, enough proof that he was up for a killing spree, thanks to the quick response by the police.
On August 3, 2019, a man went on a rampage shooting and killing 22 shoppers on El Paso’s eastside. Among them were Mexican nationals and a US Army veteran, then surrendering to the police.
We could go on and on mentioning a lot more mass shootings.
It is therefore evident enough that gun control laws are an important issue that has made politicians, aspiring to be presidents in the United States, review their manifestos insofar as gun control is concerned
In his manifesto, Sen. Cory Booker, the democratic party aspiring presidential candidate insisted that, if he is elected President, all gun owners will be required to get a license from the federal government.
Sen. Bernie Sanders and Vice President Joe Biden supported buyback programs. Biden insisted that there should be a ban on assault weapons and most importantly, universal background checks. Additionally, Sen Kamala Harris, also aspiring to be President, has hinted on reviving the 1994 law that banned assault weapons but expired in the year 2004. Why would civilians possess assault weapons?
Gun control is also an essential topic for students and features in almost all subjects. It would be wrong if the gun control topic is ignored in our classrooms. Students, therefore, are required to understand the current laws and regulations regarding gun control, and also make contributions on the same through argumentative and persuasive essays.
After thorough investigations by our research team with knowledge and experience in Psychology, Political Science, Healthcare, Law, and Sociology, we have created a perfect guide for students who intend to get the best grades in their gun control essays. Understanding all the sections on gun control essay will help you to be a pro in essay writing, and most importantly open your mind into perspective.
There is a lot of relevant content on Gun control on the internet, much more that you as a student requires.
Do not get me wrong, the online information is essential, but because of the strict timeline that we have as students, it gets difficult to go through all this information.
Students are, therefore, needed to be smart in conducting their research, gather the necessary information, and have the essay ready for marking within the stipulated time.
Gun control has its roots from the second amendment which reads: “A well-regulated Militia, being necessary for the security of a free state, the right for people to bear and keep Arm, shall not be infringed”
However, the statement in the second amendment has spurred debates in the extent and scope of the law. Students, therefore, need to be conversant with the second amendment before making any argument regarding gun control.
Numerous precedents followed the second amendment, and the federal court was obliged to make clarifications on various aspects. The most relevant cases were:
In brief, the ruling, made by Chief Justice Morrison Waite, left the African Americans from the South vulnerable and at the mercies of the white-dominated state governments, and also allowed the Ku Klux Klan (An American white supremacist hate group) to use paramilitary force and hence suppress black voting. The ruling, therefore, permitted deprivations of rights and sparkled violence against the freed slaves. The newly freed slaves were deprived of equal protection by the law, citizenship rights, and several other provisions from the fourteenth amendment.
In the Miller case, the Arkansas federal district court had charged Frank Layton and Jack Miller with a violation of the National Firearms Act, commonly known as the ‘NFA’ of 1934. Miller and Layton had transported a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun in interstate commerce. However, the district court lost the case, as Miller argued that the court had violated the second amendment.
In a turn of events, the supreme court overruled the district court ruling and insisted that the second amendment did not guarantee a person to bear and keeping a sawed-off double-barrel 12-gauge shotgun. Justice James of the supreme court argued that the second amendment did not guarantee the possession of such an instrument.
In this case, the supreme court argued that the second amendment protected the right of an individual to have a firearm for the traditionally recognized purpose of self-defense at home. The court also held that the handgun ban by the District of Columbia (which required that gun owners must keep their shotguns bound by a trigger lock or disassembled and unloaded) violated the guarantee of defense within a home.
The supreme court also added that right to own a gun would continue to be regulated and that it is unlimited
The decision, in this case, brought to light the uncertainties that were left by the District of Columbia v. Heller ruling insofar as the scope of the gun rights within a state is concerned. The court decided that the right of a person in keeping and bearing a firearm as prescribed in the second amendment is incorporated by either the immunities clause or the Due Process Clause.
The cases above, among other cases, are a perfect foundation for understanding gun control. Therefore, familiarizing yourself with such will be a great way to build your knowledge and expertise in conducting research or writing an essay on gun control.
It is also equally essential that students understand the present-day debates on gun control. Understand the position of politicians such as Bernie Sanders, Donald Trump, Joe Biden, Kamala Harris, Michael Bennet, Cory Booker, Steve Bullock, Pete Buttigieg, Julian Castro, Bill de Blasio, Kirsten Gillibrand, John Hickenlooper, Jay Inslee, Elizabeth Warren, Andrew Yang, and so forth on gun control.
Additionally, remember to skim through Pro-gun control articles as well as Anti-gun control articles.
Paul Barrett, a Harvard Law School graduate, lays down well-rounded rational claims and scholarly analysis on the supreme court justice John Paul Steven’s call for the reviewing and change of the second amendment. Paul Barrett argues that when the second amendment was originally formed, it was meant for the homeland or military security to protect the civilians. The second amendment was not meant for the ordinary American. Through this fact, the author establishes logos in his article, hence making his argument credible.
Paul Barrett claims that the justice system has not worked on creating safer gun laws and that the government only tries to “Make friends with the National Rifle Association” rather than trying to protect the citizens.
Phoebe Maltz Bovy, the author of “It’s Time to Ban Guns. Yes, all of them” insists that nobody, including the police, should own a gun. In her article she says
“Ban guns. All guns. Get rid of guns in homes, the streets, and as much as possible, the police.”
Phoebe continues to say that the population should not be divided into those who might do something stupid, evil or get self-destructive with a gun and those who will not.
Phoebe insists that extremism in defense of tyranny is no sin.
The article is a comprehensive survey on the history of gun laws, the National Rifle Association, the culture of gun ownership in the United States, and the second amendment. The article lists down incidences and cases that shaped legislation as well as the public opinion insofar as gun ownership is concerned.
There are more than three hundred million guns, privately owned, in the US. This surmounts to one gun for every American. The US is the nation with the highest gun ownership by civilians in the world, followed by Yemen. However, it is not that all Americans own guns, most of the civilians with guns own more than one gun. Gun ownership is higher among the whites than among the blacks and higher among the older civilians than amongst the younger people.
Understanding the problem of gun control in the US in both a cultural and historical dimension is a perfect platform for students in conducting research on gun control.
Understanding the various viewpoints of individuals supporting the current gun control rules is a milestone towards positive criticism. This article sheds four significant talking points which politicians, as well as pundits, use to explain why the tragedies associated with gun violence do not necessarily mean that the government should tighten up the access to these deadly firearms.
The talking points are:
1. “Guns do not kill people. People kill people.”
2. “The only thing that would stop a guy with a gun is a good guy with a gun.”
3. “The individuals involved have inadequate mental health care.”
4. “It is a constitutional right to have a gun, as prescribed in the second amendment.”
The author counters all these arguments objectively, explaining how, even though the arguments may make sense to some, the crazy amount of damage that guns bring along is reason enough to limit individuals who can get their hands on one.
The author concludes that the legislatures need to pass laws that will make civilians feel safe while at the movies, in class, in church, and so forth without the need to worry that some maladjusted person will ‘revenge’ by raining bullets on unsuspecting civilians.
The article explains how enforcing laws in a specific State is curtailed by gun laws from other States. Some states in the US have stricter gun laws than others. Individuals intending to commit crime from States with more stringent gun laws travel to the States with less strict gun laws, purchase the weapon, and travel back to commit the crime.
For example, the minimum age for purchasing a weapon in Nevada is 19 years, while that in California is 21. California has very tough gun laws. However, the strict gun laws are neutralized by states such as Nevada which has laxer rules insofar as gun control is concerned. The same case applied to New Jersey, Chicago, and New York, whereby weapons flow from states with comparably weak gun laws.
Unfortunately, Congress is handicapped, and this problem is left as a responsibility of the constituent States.
Dave Arnold offers his opinion on the way forward. He believes that gun control is not necessary. He explains how the government should be more focussed in making it hard for people with violent mental illnesses and criminals to possess deadly firearms. Dave argues that, just like in Illinois, every gun owner must also have a Firearm Owners Identification Card, also known as the FIOD.
Whenever one purchases a firearm, they must be subjected to background checks, they should also undergo a waiting period, and that no one under the age of 18 should be allowed to possess a firearm or ammunition. The under 21s should also not be allowed to purchase ammunition.
From his article, we learn that the FOID card also has a chip which allows the firearm owner to be traced by the necessary authority.
Dave also recommends huge investments in mental health services from schools to places of work. He reckons that safety and prevention is the key.
The authors of this article shed some light on the arguments that the individuals not in support of gun control bring forth.
The first argument is that a good guy with a gun would stop a mass shooting. Donald Trump is among the politicians who argued on the same line of thoughts. During his campaigns, while discussing the Orlando attack, Trump insisted that the attack would not have been that bad if there was a good person with a gun.
Others argue that shooters specifically target gun-free zones. Shooters mainly target areas where they are sure that the victims may not be able to defend themselves. Therefore, if everyone is given the right to own a gun, then there will be no gun-free zones.
Additionally, individuals who are not comfortable with the campaign for gun control also add that no law can prevent such tragedies. There is no gun-control proposal that would prevent terrorists from arming themselves.
Laws do not deter terrorists, and that’s why in the first place they are termed as terrorists.
In a nutshell, criminals do not follow the law, imposing the gun control proposals to the ordinary citizen exposes them to more risks. The anti-gun control campaigners argue that you should blame the bad guy and not the tool that they use.
The Author Taya Kyle, who’s the wife to the late Chris Kyle, a subject of the movie: “American Sniper” brings the gun control debate into perspective. She argues that we cannot legislate human nature and that a very small number of people commits horrific mass killings. Kyle, therefore, believes that we don’t have to make laws for millions of Americans just because of the choices of a few evildoers.
She adds that having a deadly weapon does not make anyone a killer and compares the debate to the extreme anger we have on the highways when we feel that some careless drivers have put us in harm’s way.
Kyle concludes that evil will always find its way, and that murder is not a new issue, will never go away, and that murder is independent of the method used. We should value freedom and have the courage to face reality with no anxiety or fear.
The solution is that we accept that murder involves a few people and that the vast majority of the Americans are the good ones.
Find below, arguments by individuals supporting stricter gun control measures
1. The gun control measures will ensure that it becomes hard for banned rifles entering into the US.
2. The strict gun control measures will ensure that civilians are safe by making it possible to track down gun owners through a Firearm Owners Identification Card, also known as the FIOD.
3. Stricter gun control measures will ensure that weapons do not fall into the hands of the under aged, teenagers, and the mentally ill individuals.
4. Stricter Gun control measures will ensure that criminals do not purchase firearms in one State and proceed to commit a crime in another State
5. Pro-gun control position advocates for preventing violence in colleges and high schools
6. Stricter gun control measures will handicap most organized criminals as the accessibility to firearms will be limited
Find below the arguments of individuals against gun control laws:
1. Stricter regulations on gun control will not affect violence per se.
2. Stricter gun control laws will increase fear on the civilians
3. Criminals do not follow the law; hence, criminals will still commit a crime
4. A small number of people commits horrific mass killings compared to the overall population of ethical and responsible people. Hence no need to make laws affecting millions of Americans just because of a few evildoers.
5. Evil will always find its way whether there are stricter gun control laws or not.
6. A good guy with a gun can prevent a mass shooting
Before commencing on the writing process ensure that you select a topic that engages your audience.
Also, ensure that your position on the selected topic is clear as day. Always start with the following:
1. As mentioned earlier, research on gun control, have a clear overview of the current situation insofar as gun control is concerned. What are the politicians and television pundits saying? What is their stand on the topic of gun control? Understand the second amendment, the changes that preceded the second amendment. Take a look at what states that have been marred with tremendous changes on the second amendment. By doing this, you will be in a better position to define your stand on the topic. You will be able to pick a side, argue objectively, and most importantly, convince your audience.
2. Pick a side and stick to your position. Whether it is PRO or AGAINST stricter gun laws, stick to your side. When you mix up your content by being on both sides, your audience will be disappointed with your content, and it may no longer be engaging. Ensure that you have at least three points to support your position on gun laws. Jot them down, and be prepared to expound on them.
3. Always have a target audience in mind. If you are targeting law students, use the technical terms in law. Ensure that you include reliable reports, statistics, and references. Having a target audience in mind ensures that your essay is engaging to a specific group of people, and hence the feedback after they read will always be positive.
4. Also, ensure that you have an outline. Your outline will have the points that you wish to relay to your target audience and the thesis statement. The thesis statement will feature in the middle or the end of your introduction. The thesis statement will provide a clear and concise summary of your position on gun control. It should be one sentence, and it may be reiterated.
5. The topic that you select must be related to your thesis statement. Remember that your thesis statement is a summary of your stand on gun control. Therefore, your audience must be able to see a similarity between the topic that you selected and the thesis statement and remain curious about what you have to say.
It is first crucial that you understand what an expository essay is. Expository comes from the word exposition, which means to expose. With this type of essay, you are expected to explain, illustrate, explicate or clarify an issue in a way that it becomes clear to your audience. In the context of gun control rules, you will be expected to illustrate your facts and do intensive research on the topic and your stand on that specific topic. If you believe that gun control is a conspiracy by the government to profit from the civilians, research, explain, and expose your facts. Easy, right?
An argumentative essay is different from an expository essay due to the amount of research involved. Expository essays will not require too much research and are usually shorter in length. With an argumentative essay on gun control, you will be required to present arguments for PRO and ANTI gun control. You could equally balance both positions, or forcefully present one side more than the other. It will depend on you, and what side you intend to support the most. Don’t forget to include relevant and reliable sources supporting your argument.
Just like the phrase suggests, a cause and effect essay tries to look at the causes of a specific issue and the expected outcomes on the same. This type of essay is also sometimes referred to as the reason and result essay. In the context of gun control, take a scenario of what the President of the US said on gun control and the effect that his speech had to the general public. For instance, some people may argue that Trump somehow incited white supremacists before the EL Paso, Texas, and Dayton, Ohio mass shootings. It is up to you to provide references that support such a statement.
A persuasive essay is solely meant to convince an audience on your stand. In a persuasive essay on gun control, you will be required to present your argument, research, and ideas on the topic, then sway your audience to your position. Use logic to show your audience that your viewpoint is more substantial than theirs. You will be required to support your arguments with convincing facts. Don’t worry if it gets a little bit emotional, that’s normal.
Besides, a student must understand the pillars of a persuasive essay. The components are Ethos, Logos, and Pathos.
In Ethos, a student is expected to provide credibility of their content. Credibility is achieved through referencing and in-text citation.
Under Logos, you will be required to assist your audience in understanding your ideas by being objective and using logic. Let your audience know why a specific position is either good or bad.
Pathos brings up emotions. Make your audience feel empathy. Be caring and sensitive while relaying your content.
In such an essay, you will be expected to illustrate the similarities and differences between the two entities. In this case, our subjects would be the PRO gun control opinions and ANTI gun control opinions. You can also opt to illustrate the similarities and differences in opinion between two public figures insofar as gun control is concerned. For example, you can compare and contrast what Vice President Joe Biden and senator Kamala Harris think on gun control.
A narrative essay entails telling a story regarding a specific experience. The experience may be someone else’s, yours, fictional or real. In the context of gun control, you can tell a story on what happened because of some gun control regulations, or how it would have been in the situation on gun control was different.
A definition essay requires that you explain the meaning of a specific term. There are three steps that you must always adhere too while preparing a definition essay:
· Tell your audience the term or notion that you intend to define
· Present basic and clear information on the same
· Use examples, facts, and anecdotes which would make it easier for your audience to understand.
In this case, you are expected to look back at what you have learned then illustrate the lessons have developed, changed or made you grow. After researching all aspects of gun control and gun violence, you can jot down what you have learned from the research. Alternatively, if you are a victim of a mass shooting or have a close friend or relative who was a victim of the same, you can write down the first-hand experience and don’t forget to include the lessons from experience, or basically how the experience has shaped who you are today.
An Annotated Bibliography Essay is a working list of references such as journal articles, websites, online documents, and books. Each reference should be followed by a short summative and evaluative paragraph known as the annotation.
You are expected to scan academic journals, do thorough research on books, news reports, and journal articles related to gun control, the second amendment, and so forth. Complete your research of each source on gun control by writing a summary (an annotation).
Take a critical look at a specific position on gun control to discuss the strong and weak points of the position taken. For example, you can choose to take a critical look at one of the views on the gun control debate.
In this type, you are required to describe how a situation feels in terms of hearing, smelling, sight, and all other senses. For example, you could write on how it would be if no civilian, including the police, had guns or how it would be if everyone owned a gun.
A process essay is meant for giving your audience guidance or directions. It is a “How to” essay. In the case of gun control, you could write on the best procedure to end gun violence, and so forth.
1. Gun control in the United States
2. Stop the bad people from acquiring guns
3. Gun Control Rules in the United Kingdom
4. The line between deadly force and self-defense
5. More guns equal more violence
6. Gun Control in New Zealand
7. Will stricter gun control rules minimize the circulation of illegal weapons?
8. The revision of the second amendment
9. What are the economic consequences of Gun Control in Chicago, Texas, Nevada, or California?
10. Death and Guns in the US
11. Economic benefits of Stricter Gun Control in the US
12. Domestic Violence and Gun Control
13. Gang Violence and Gun Control
14. Guns at School
15. Youth, School, and Gang Violence
16. How the United States got its Guns?
17. A Comparison between Gun Control rules in California vs. Texas
18. What Gun Control Measures would help in Identifying Potential criminals in our society
19. Violence, manhood, and American culture
20. Mass Shootings and Domestic Terrorism
21. The US is the worst in the world on mass shootings
22. Private Guns and Public Health
23. Why Kids Kill
24. A Comparison of Gun policy between Canada and the United States
25. All States should have similar Gun Control policies
26. Gun Control and Armed Violence Prevention
27. Understanding the Gun Culture in the United States
28. What is Stopping the Federal government from Implementing strict gun control laws
29. The fight in Keeping the US free from Gun Violence
1. Education is the answer: Gun Control will never be the answer
2. A conservative look into gun control helps minimize the violations
3. Sweden and Australia as a benchmark on gun control
4. Bernie Sanders and gun control
5. The propaganda of Gun Culture started with Video games
6. What are they not telling us behind the gun policy debates
7. The Limitations of the current arms reduction laws
8. Arms reduction across the states of the US
9. Gun rights vs Gun control
10. Will strict gun policies increase the risk of terror attacks?
11. Why not ban everything that is an imminent threat: Gun Control
12. Criminals will never obey gun control laws
13. Stricter Guns laws: A reduction of liberty and infringement of human rights
14. Social media is to blame: makes murder seem like an easy way to fame
15. An Annotated Bibliography on journal articles not in support of arms reduction
A research paper on gun control requires significant and theoretical data with in-depth analysis.
In other words, take about five expository essays on gun control and imagine them on a more detailed scale. The research paper may also have an argument based on the thesis and supported with suggestive evidence from reliable sources.
It may seem complicated at the beginning, but once you are equipped with the appropriate steps, it gets easier.
However, a research paper on gun control will require extensive research.
Before commencing on the writing process, ensure that you have enough paper, different colours of highlighters and index cards. Then follow the steps below:
1 Select a topic on gun control that you feel comfortable doing. It should be a topic that inspires you.
2 Find reliable sources on gun control.
3 Organize your points
4 Brainstorm a perfect outline
5 Create your first draft
6 Go through the first draft
7 Re-write the draft and edit
You must carefully plan, edit, and proofread your work. Also, ensure that your thesis is concise.All your paragraphs must start with topical sentences, and each paragraph should only have one idea.
Gun-related violence is a pervasive issue and has greatly increased over the past years in the United States. A detailed report by ‘USA Today’ tracked an increase in the number of deaths between 2006 and 2017 (Kupchik & Nicole 147). Most of these shootings were willfully done by perpetrators killing a minimum of four people. This violence affects many institutions such schools and the public at large. There is no standard criterion for describing mass shooting. However, the most common definition of mass shooting is public gun violence in which the shooter kills at least four people. Nevertheless, home deaths and suicides greatly contribute to the total annual mass gun violence death in the United States. There are a number of theories on the causes of mass gun violence such as mental illness, accessibility to guns, desire to revenge and search for fame and notoriety.
Mentally ill people are likely to commit suicide and even kill other people. Research shows that mentally ill people who are not under any treatment are at high risk of engaging in gun-related mass killings (Agnich & Laura 28). For instance, the public killers who committed brutal attacks on students such as the Sandy Hook Shooter, the Parkland Shooter and the Virginia Tech Shooter have histories of mental challenges (Buerger et al. 15). None of these attackers was receiving psychiatric medical attention making them to be at high risk of engaging in gun-related violence. The most vital connection between mass gun violence and mental illness is through suicide which accounts for approximately two-thirds of the annual deaths due to gun-related violence (Buerger et al. 16). Most suicidal cases in the United States are gun-related.
There is a high accessibility to guns in the United States. Overwhelming evidence shows that the rate of gun ownership in any population is directly related with the rate of gun deaths in that population (NCHS 35). For instance, states in the United States which have a slightly higher gun ownership rate tend to have more mass deaths and suicides. Statistics show that one-gun shot is seven times more likely to cause death than stabbing with a knife or killing with any other weapon. On the contrary, these guns can protect the owners from people they perceive to be dangerous. However, guns in homes are more likely to kill the residents through domestic violence, suicide and accidents. According to the Federal Bureau of Investigation, people committed approximately 268 deaths as a result of self-defense in 2015 (Barber et al. 924). In the same period, report from the National Center for Health Statistics recorded that there were about 189 deaths caused by accidental gun shots (NCHS 36). However, there is another argument to justify the ownership of guns that it will be useful if the U.S government armed with heavy weapons became a dictatorship. On the contrary, owning guns will not stop a nation from being a dictatorship but instead citizens should elect good leaders who can represent them well.
Most perpetrators especially those attacking schools have a desire to revenge. School shooters show or leave behind evidence that they were victims of bullying at some time. Bullying in the United States schools is a very serious concern for public health. National statistics suggest that about 31% of youth have been bullied with their own age mates (NCHS 39). The victims are likely to suffer from humiliation and stigma which could result to thoughts of revenge, use of illicit substances, injury or suicide. Also, it is easier for bullied students to access loaded guns compared to their non-bullied peers. It is even much easier for students suffering from both traditional bullying and cyberbullying to access guns without their parents’ permission.
Other gun-related perpetrators engage in violence for fame and notoriety. In most cases, the media victimizes the victims of gun violence and instead tend to glorify the shooter. Also, the increase of mass gun violence is associated with the wide availability of information on the internet. There is violence all over starting from video games, to movies and films. The youth are now addicted to such media. They are even motivated when they are ranked best after mass killing especially in video games. Study shows that such media increases aggression and creates interest among the youth to access guns and practice their acquired skills in real life. Further, research estimates 73% of school deaths are committed using a pistol (Agnich & Laura 18). After the attacks, media concentrates much on gun control instead of the shooters. Also, parents have contributed to such violence by storing guns where they can be easily accessible by troubled youth struggling with depression and revengeful thoughts.
Most politicians in the United States attribute mass gun violence to mental illness. However, this is not true because only one percent deaths are found by court to be committed by mental illness. This is a clear indication that mental illness is not the major cause of mass gun-related violence in the United States. Further study shows that its only 22% of shooters who suffer from mental illness, the other 78% are mentally well (Buerger et al. 19). Also, if mental illness was the major cause of gun-related deaths, then European countries could be experiencing the same death rates since the rates of mental illness are equal to those of the United States. Mental illness could be a factor contributing to mass gun violence but happens under other causes such as accessibility to guns. Therefore, when preventing gun mass violence factors such as gun ownership, bullying among the youth and internet influence should be considered.
In conclusion, gun mass violence in the United States is greatly increasing over the years. There are a number of theories attributing this violence to mental illness, gun ownership, desire for revenge due to bullying, and desire for fame and notoriety. Study suggests that mentally ill people especially those who are not under psychiatric attention are at high risk of engaging in gun-related violence. Also, there is a high rate of gun ownership in the United States. States with a slightly high ownership rate record a high rate of deaths. People own guns for self defense but these guns are likely to kill residents of the homes through suicide, accidents or violence. Children are the most common group of people affected by such gun-related deaths. Some attackers who are victims of both traditional and cyber bullying suffer humiliation and tend to seek revenge. They also have an easier access to guns than non-bullied peers. Other perpetrators shoot for fame and notoriety.
Gun control is one of the conditions that have led to the regulations of guns sale in society. Restricting access and possession of guns in the community is critical since the majority of people usually misuse gun s in the world. According to recent studies, lack of gun control is associated with several deaths and violence in the country. This is because many people can access guns, and they end up killing each other. There is a need for the adoption of policies that will reduce the possession of firearms in the country. From the above background, the primary objective of this essay is to support the view that gun control is not required and should be abolished in the society.
The process of regulating the access and possession of guns in the world is challenging since it is based on different jurisdictions. However, it should be noted that we do not need guns. The society has witnessed several challenges due to firearms, and it is high time we abolish gun control programs. When people have access to weapons, they misuse it, and this is evident among many schools. Children are accessing guns from their parents, and this has led to mass shootings in schools.
I believe that gun control is one of the dangerous policies we currently have in society. The number of deaths due to gun-related challenges cannot be accounted for. Both children and adults are dying due to poor gun policies. Wife and husbands are killing each other every day. It is time we abolish gun control models. Past studies indicate that a high rate of injuries has been inflicted on others since the introduction of gun control programs. A study done in late 2017 indicated that having gun control does not help to thwart violence and criminal activities in the society.
With gun control programs, the society has been witnessing high levels of suicide rates. Crimes associated with violence have also increased to a large extent due to gun control policies. Countries, where there are gun control programs, have witnessed increased death rates from violence. Criminals are also taking advantage of gun control policies to engage in criminal activities. Bank robberies with guns where some people end up dying have increased since the introduction of gun control systems.
Although the law prevents people with mental illness from possessing guns, it has been established that some mentally ill people have gained access to firearms in society. This has led to high death rates and disturbance in the world. I believe that allowing people to have guns is dangerous, and there are some conditions where some carry their firearms openly in public, and this is very scary. It is essential that all individuals who have guns take them in a concealed bucket. Carrying a gun to public places such as in school and houses of worship is also dangerous. The general public feels intimated where gun policies are not adequately regulated.
Therefore, I believe that gun control programs should be abolished. Gun control is creating more deaths in society than expected. Parents are allowing their children to have guns in schools. Mental illness individuals have gain access to firearms in the world, and this has led to more deaths. Victims of violence end up dying due to poor gun control systems. With the high crime rate and an increase in mass murder, it is time that we abolish gun control programs. I believe that gun control models have increased the ability of criminals to access guns, and this is dangerous towards the economic development of society. Gun violence has increased across the world, despite many countries having gun control systems. In that sense, they should be abolished.
Gun control is policies that help to regulate arm possession and allow individuals to access guns in cases of violence. Recent studies indicate that gun control has helped improve the safety of people across the globe. Many legal jurisdictions support gun control. For example, the United States of America Constitution, especially the Second Amendments, support gun ownership among the civilians. The supporters of gun control programs argue that a well-regulated country should allow citizens to posse’s guns and to increase their safety against criminals. I believe that gun control models are essential, as illustrated in this essay.
Gun control provides the best policies that individual can use to own guns in society. This is important in deterring crime since the public will have the courage to engage with criminals. With gun control policies, the community will feel they can protect themselves since they have the weapons to fight criminals. High sense of safety in the world is associated with high socio-economic development and trade, and this should be encouraged.
Moreover, it is common knowledge that hunting using guns is a sport, and people are using gun control programs in guiding their hunting sports activities. Currently, there are more than ten million hunters in the United States, and they engage and spend more than $8 billion on guns in late 2016. This means that the government is gaining a lot of revenue from gun control programs. Government agencies have reported a lot of revenues and other social benefits from gun-hunting based sports.
It should also be noted that abolishing gun control policies will not prevent crime in the world. There are several countries which do not support gun laws, and they experienced high levels of criminal activities. This means that abolishing gun control models will not prevent criminals from engaging in crime in society. The government should allow people to access guns without discrimination.
I also believe that gun control programs help to reduce the high control that the government have against the public. Conditions, where only government agencies can access guns, are associated with high levels of tyranny and political assassinations. It is vital that the government allow the public to access firearms under laid down procedures.
With gun control programs, I believe that the public will have the right they deserve to protect themselves from dangerous criminals. The current society has been associated with several challenges, including terrorist groups, and having gun control models can help reduce such problems. I believe that gun control programs are associated with gun training and guidance, and this can help reduce suicides in the country. Many people will die if they posse’s guns through illegal means and the government should adopt mandatory training to all individual have guns to reduce gun accidents and injuries. Gun education campaigns should be introduced in schools to ensure that people do not misuse guns in society. The current community includes many invaders who are dangerous and only gun control policies can help improve public safety.
In conclusion, it is evident from this essay that gun control policies and programs are essential. The government should continue with gun control programs to promote public safety. Strict gun control does not work in all regions across the world, and effective gun control systems should be established. It is also evident that criminals will still gain guns despite abolishing gun control policies. This means that citizens should be given the freedom to own guns to protect and defend themselves in cases of criminal elements. This will promote peace, unity and security across all regions in the country.
Recently, a trend has been noted whereby there is deterioration of national security and the safety of citizens in general. As a result, a number of policy makers have called for the revision of gun control laws to more strict rules and regulations. The regulations will be aimed at ensuring that everyone follows the proper channels when it comes to the possession, selling, alteration, production and use of guns by civilians.
However, the introduction of such policies is easier said than done mainly because gun control is a controversial topic as different individuals hold varying opinions. Individuals supporting gun control, believe that firearms should be restricted and only given to authorized and trained citizens. It will serve everyone well knowing that accessing a firearm is not as easy. Those who are against gun control claim that “their security is put at risk if they do not possess one or more firearms within their households” (Lott, 2013). Many households believe that having a gun is the first step to ensuring that their security is guaranteed. This belief is irrational as possession of guns has strongly been linked to an increase in insecurity posing the need for strict gun control rules.
According to Goss’ findings, in the year 2015, two studies were conducted and a shocking conclusion was arrived at. It was found that the law which required civilians to get a permit before making a firearm purchase, commonly known as the permit-to-purchase law which was amended in Connecticut in the year 1995, showed a reduction in firearm suicides and the number of homicides also showed a decent drop (120). However, the law was then repealed and another immediate study was conducted and showed that the repealing of this law was linked to a 16.1% increase in firearm suicide and deaths that occurred from homicides. Canada, for example, has a very strict policy in gun control and in 1991, when they implemented Bill C-17, the law that governs gun control, a study that was conducted in 2004 was able to reveal that after its implementation, the firearm suicide rates as well as homicides related to firearms made a significant drop.
According to Neely, there have been a number of massive school shootings in the United States up to this date; twenty-two in total so far (721-737).
These incidents keep happening because reckless and unruly citizens have easy access to firearms. They can acquire them illegally or even at a gun shop without having gone through the thorough process of training and filling out all the required legal documents. Families end up losing their children and loved ones in schools and learning institutions; places where parents entrust the safety and security of their children to the teachers. Most upper class neighborhood residents always end up having a gun in the house. This is usually because of security reasons and also because they are of a high profile. These are mostly politicians, directors and managers, people working in high level institutions and those holding high ranks at their places of work with a high level of income. They could also possess a firearm for recreational purposes such as skeet shooting.
On the contrary, there are also people living in run down neighborhoods who also feel like it is necessary for them to have a gun. In their case, this is mostly because of security concerns in their neighborhoods as the crime rate in these areas tend to be higher than any other place.
Most of them even go as far as having a firearm on them when they leave their homes. However, they will not be the only ones walking around with guns as anything could happen to them between their places of work and their homes. It is possible that most of these individuals may have acquired their firearms through illegal methods since the hustle of getting one in low class neighborhoods is not as hectic and thorough background checks are not performed. This tendency has been linked to the fact that most illegal gun traders and cartels usually base themselves in these neighborhoods and even sell them at a lower price or make an exchange with something they might be interested in, and eventually they end up selling firearms to criminals.
Gun trade on its own is one booming business, not just in the United States but internationally. Cartels have been able to establish themselves in the gun trade business over the years and one would wonder how they cannot be infiltrated. Some of them do gun trafficking alongside drug trafficking. Others sell drugs and narcotics in exchange for firearms. It is a vicious cycle that never ends since one business fuels the other.
Illegal purchases are made online via the dark web and civilians are able to buy firearms that they are not qualified to handle or even acquire firearms that they do not know how to operate – illegal purchases do not come with a script or a manual! Most terrorist operations are able to acquire their firearms through this method. This trend has been brought to a steady decline since the law to have universal background checks was passed. All gun stores together with other retailers that sold firearms were required to perform this measure to all individuals who wished to make a firearm purchase.
On the contrary, this was not the case for urban area as this led to an increase of firearm-related suicides and homicides. In order to curb this issue, gun stores were required to practice the system of issuing permits to firearm purchasers. The government has also put in place some rules and regulations regarding gun purchasing. For instance, an individual cannot just purchase any gun without the proper permits. A firearm such as the M16 rifle is of a military grade and strict laws have been put in place regarding the purchase of weapons of such caliber.
In conclusion, gun control is a very important aspect and it should be embraced by every person for their own safety and for the safety of their families and the entire country in general. Fewer guns on the streets means fewer crimes, gun-related suicides and homicides.
Lott, John R. More guns, less crime: Understanding crime and gun control laws. University of Chicago Press, 2013.
Spitzer, Robert J. Politics of gun control. Routledge, 2015.
Zimring, Frank. “Is gun control likely to reduce violent killings?.” The University of Chicago Law Review 35.4 (1968): 721-737.
Kleck, Gary, and E. Britt Patterson. “The impact of gun control and gun ownership levels on violence rates.” Journal of Quantitative Criminology 9.3 (1993): 249-287.
Goss, Kristin A. Disarmed: The missing movement for gun control in America. Vol. 120. Princeton University Press, 2010.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more