Develop case study, must be a minimum of 3 FULL pages of original discussion and analysis, not counting the title page, reference page, figures, tables, and appendixes. The sta
Develop case study, must be a minimum of 3 FULL pages of original discussion and analysis, not
counting the title page, reference page, figures, tables, and appendixes. The statements in each
Case Study must be supported by at least 1 scholarly reference, cited throughout the narrative
and placed on the reference list in the APA format. Organize content under Level 1 headings.
CASE INFORMATION & GRADING RUBRIC ATTACHED
Criteria Ratings Points
Topic, domains and concepts
35 to >31 pts
Advanced
Clearly addresses the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates all domains, comprehensive in content, uses terms and concepts from reading, demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source published within the past five years, correctly cited throughout the narrative.
31 to >28 pts
Proficient
Addresses the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates most domains, discusses content, uses terms and concepts from reading, and demonstrates clarity of expression. Statements are supported by at least 1 scholarly source published within the past five years, cited at least once in the narrative.
28 to >0 pts
Developing
Does a poor to fair job of addressing the topic assigned, stays on topic, evaluates some domains, discusses content, does not use terms and concepts from reading, does not demonstrate clarity of expression. Statements are not supported by at least 1 scholarly source published within the past five years and cited in the narrative.
0 pts
Not Present
Failing. Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to provide the required content.
35 pts
Work Habits
30 to >27 pts
Advanced
Superior work in all areas. Student consistently exceeds minimal expectations in all areas regarding content analysis, synthesis, and evaluation of topics, participation, timeliness, and writing style.
27 to >24 pts
Proficient
Good work in most areas. Student demonstrates minor deficiencies in some areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
24 to >0 pts
Developing
Poor to fair work in most areas. Student exhibits need for improvement in most areas regarding content, analysis, writing style, and/or participation.
0 pts
Not Present
Failing. Student shows evidence of refusal or inability to meet minimum standards of work.
30 pts
Personal application
5 to >4 pts
Advanced
The student provides thorough applications as a result of his/her professional life.
4 to >3 pts
Proficient
The student provides good applications as a result of his/her professional life.
3 to >0 pts
Developing
The student provides poor to fair applications as a result of his/her professional life.
0 pts
Not Present
The student provides zero applications as a result of his/her professional life.
5 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
APA Formatting
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
APA format followed, organizes content under APA headings, no large filler quotes, clearly does not plagiarize, clearly finds supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study. APA-formatted reference list and in-text citations are included.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
APA format followed most of the time, headings contained some errors, has no large filler quotes, does not plagiarize, finds supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study. Reference list and in-text citations contain 2 – 5 errors.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
APA format inconsistent throughout; missing headings; some large filler quotes; does not plagiarize; finds few supportive reasons in reading and applies them in the case study; reference list, in-text citations, and headings contain more than 5 errors.
0 pts
Not Present
APA format was not followed; large filler quotes present; does not plagiarize; does not find supportive reasons in reading or apply them in the case study; reference list and in-text citations are not included.
10 pts
Spelling, Grammar and Mechanics
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
The Case Study begins with a title page and was typed in 12-point Times New Roman fonts on all pages; all pages were double-spaced; 1-inch margins on all four sides were used. Correct grammar and punctuation were present throughout. Correct spelling and spacing were present throughout. The paper was typed in a formal style and written in the third person.
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
Some errors with the title page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; or 1-inch margins were present. Some errors with errors with one or more of the following were present: • Grammar, and/or; • Punctuation, and/or, • Spelling, and/or; • Spacing. Some errors with formal style and/or third person were present. 1 – 3 errors were present.
7 to >0 pts
Developing
Significant errors with the title page, 12-point Times New Roman fonts, double-spacing; align text left; extra spacing; or 1-inch margins were present. Significant errors with one or more of the following were present: • Grammar, and/or; • Punctuation, and/or, • Spelling, and/or; • Spacing. Significant errors with formal style and/or third person were present. More than 3 errors were present.
0 pts
Not Present
Errors with spelling, grammar, and/or mechanics were so pervasive that the readability and level of scholarship of the paper were substantially reduced.
10 pts
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
Criteria Ratings Points
Page count
10 to >9 pts
Advanced
At least 3 complete pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures).
9 to >7 pts
Proficient
At least 2.9 pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures).
7 to >0 pts
Developing
2.0 – 2.8 pages of original graduate-level analysis, evaluation, and discussion (plus title page, reference page, and tables or figures).
0 pts
Not Present
Less than 2 pages submitted.
10 pts
Total Points: 100
Case Study Grading Rubric | BUSI643_B01_202320
,
Designing a Job Rewards Analysis
CleanBody Organics is a national distributor of natural soap, moisturizers, and shampoo and conditioner. It has a brick-and-mortar store in Asheville, North Carolina, which serves as a conduit for learning more about its customers, but the majority of its sales are from online distribution. As the organization expands, it has decided to supplement its previous strategic profile of directly selling to consumers with plans to also distribute its products in co-ops and organic grocery stores.
The greatest concern in the planned expansion is ensuring that new employees have a strong sense of engagement and cultural values similar to those of current employees. The company’s CEO, Eve Libertine, wants to find out what motivates her current workforce, in hopes that she can use this message to hire and retain individuals with similar values and motivations in the future. As an astute student of staffing best practices, you have recommended that a careful job rewards analysis is a good way to achieve this goal.
Ms. Libertine has three key job categories that she wants to focus her analysis on. The first job is customer consultant, which other organizations refer to as a customer service representative. Individuals in this job respond to calls, e-mails, and online chats from customers with questions or complaints about products. This is a key job for the organization because of the large number of individuals occupying this role, as well as the strategic importance of maintaining customer satisfaction. The second job is a product development manager. These individuals are currently responsible for learning about the market for CleanBody products and will have an expanded role in determining how to market products to other retailers. The third page 196job is in production work. Individuals in this job make, cut, pack, and ship the soap, along with performing associated production-area tasks like keeping records and cleaning production areas. This is another job that is expected to greatly expand in numbers as the push into retail sales increases.
1. Find three job titles on O*NET that are relatively similar to the jobs at CleanBody and identify the interests, work styles, and values that are compatible with these jobs.
2. Based on the overall culture of the organization, describe three or four key goals or values that may intrinsically motivate individuals to work at CleanBody.
3. Develop three to five questions for an open-ended survey sent out to current CleanBody employees that will help refine your understanding of job rewards.
smartcustomessays.com Plagiarism Free Papers
Are you looking for custom essay writing service or even dissertation writing services? Just request for our write my paper service, and we\’ll match you with the best essay writer in your subject! With an exceptional team of professional academic experts in a wide range of subjects, we can guarantee you an unrivaled quality of custom-written papers.
Why Hire smartcustomessays.com writers to do your paper?
Quality- We are experienced and have access to ample research materials.
We write plagiarism Free Content
Confidential- We never share or sell your personal information to third parties.
Support-Chat with us today! We are always waiting to answer all your questions.
