First, return to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Answer this question: What are the personal and/or communal ethical factors that may be involved in
determining the moral position of either side in that debate?
Next, articulate and then evaluate the ethical positions using Kantian ethics (that is, the categorical
imperative) relative to the long standing debate (that is your topic chosen in the week three assignment).
Finally, create a complete annotated bibliography for 5 academic scholarly sources. You will annotate
each source. The sources should be relevant to your topic chosen in the week three assignment.
Include the following:
Annotation (a detailed reading of the source)
Each annotation section should include the following:
Summarize key points and identify key terms (using quotation marks, and citing a page in parentheses).
Describe the controversies or “problems” raised by the articles.
State whether you agree or disagree and give reasons.
Locate one or two quotations to be used in the final research project.
Evaluate the ways in which this article is important and has helped you focus your understanding.
If one believes that some abortions are unmoral but the government shouldn’t hinder one’s choice in this particular area of life. While the issue is more complex, the debate is usually framed within the framework that are based on “pro-life” as well as “pro-choice” viewpoints. Personhood, on the other side, is a term used to describe the moral status of an individual (Greasley 2017). This is the meaning that we use. when anything is considered to be a person then it is of a moral standing. Thus, we have responsibilities to each one of those who have rights. The right to live is part of this. But, the pro-choice camp is in favor of women’s right to make their own choices regarding the reproductive organs and body. They argue that pro-lifers confer sovereignty on the unborn by preventing abortions regardless of the condition of the pregnancy or the mother’s health. The actions or decisions that have to be based on rationality are called categorical imperatives. Because the goal of Pregnancy is to expand the population of humans and that the act is crucial in our lives, we could be concluded that this act is part of an imperative categorical. This implies it is Pregnancy is a practical and universal law. In contrast, abortions would be against both practical and natural legality. One reason to have an abortion could be satisfying a mental need for example, ending a unwanted pregnancy.
Delivering a high-quality product at a reasonable price is not enough anymore.
That’s why we have developed 5 beneficial guarantees that will make your experience with our service enjoyable, easy, and safe.
You have to be 100% sure of the quality of your product to give a money-back guarantee. This describes us perfectly. Make sure that this guarantee is totally transparent.Read more
Each paper is composed from scratch, according to your instructions. It is then checked by our plagiarism-detection software. There is no gap where plagiarism could squeeze in.Read more
Thanks to our free revisions, there is no way for you to be unsatisfied. We will work on your paper until you are completely happy with the result.Read more
Your email is safe, as we store it according to international data protection rules. Your bank details are secure, as we use only reliable payment systems.Read more
By sending us your money, you buy the service we provide. Check out our terms and conditions if you prefer business talks to be laid out in official language.Read more